Why Trump Cannot Be a Good President: Analysis of American Voting Patterns and Candidate Behavior

Recent polling and analysis show that, despite claims to the contrary, the majority of Americans recognize the significant flaws in Donald Trump's candidacy. This article delves into the reasons why Donald Trump cannot be a good president and explores the broader context of American voting patterns and the current political discourse.

Education and Political Awareness

The assertion that uneducated individuals constitute a major voting bloc for Donald Trump, as evidenced by poll results, highlights the critical need for a reevaluate the current education system. It is a widely held belief that a more informed citizenry can lead to better political decisions. However, if a significant portion of the population is not being properly educated, it arguably contributes to a climate of misinformation and support for candidates based on shallow or biased views.

Why Hillary Clinton is Not Seen as Evil

While it is a common notion that many voters are detractors of Hillary Clinton, often accusing her of malevolence, it is imperative to address the behavior and actions of a presidential candidate through a factual lens. The question of whether punishing Hillary Clinton is a personal mandate for voters is one that requires critical thought. The focus should instead be on her experiences and knowledge of governance, as she provides a critical perspective on how the US and the world governments operate. This understanding is key to making informed voting decisions.

Understanding Why Trump Supporters Do Not See Him as a Good President

Interestingly, even among those who support Trump, there is an underlying motivation that does not align with the traditional notion of a competent leader. Instead, many supporters view Trump not as a potential good president, but rather as a figure who will 'stamp on things and destroy things.' This perspective is rooted in a desire for chaos and disruption, a shared belief that the current 'system' is flawed, and a desire to see it fail or be dismantled.

Trump can be likened to an old-school punk rocker, whose primary goal is to disrupt and destroy. Similar to how punk rock is characterized by noise, aggression, and a ritualized act of destruction, Trump supporters find comfort in the idea of a president who will 'shatter things,' as this action provides a form of catharsis and a symbolic form of rebellion against a perceived oppressive system.

Types of Supporters: A Closer Look

The core of Trump's supporter base is predominantly composed of older white men who often hold strongly racist and supremacist beliefs. These individuals do not necessarily believe that a 'good' president is someone who promotes stability and progress but rather someone who challenges the current order and exposes what they perceive as flaws in the system. This perspective is fueled by a narrative of victimhood and a belief in a conspiracy that seeks to oppress them.

It is also important to highlight that many of these supporters are inadequately informed or choose to ignore information that contradicts their beliefs. For instance, the notion that blue-collar workers support Trump solely because he doesn't care for them is a misconception. The reality is that the majority of Trump supporters in blue-collar areas are older men who either deeply believe in white supremacy or are simply unaware of or uninterested in the complexities of policy and governance.

Why Trump Is Not Truly In It for the Country

The fundamental issue with Trump's candidacy is his singular focus on personal gain and political power. He shows little interest in the well-being of the country, as evidenced by his track record of financial misdeeds and business failures. His business ventures, such as Trump University, exemplify his tendency to con and deceive, rather than genuinely serve the public interest.

Furthermore, Trump's campaign strategy is heavily influenced by foreign entities, most notably Russia. His willingness to garner support from individuals and groups with clear biases and agendas suggests a lack of loyalty to the American public and a disregard for the democratic process. His flip-flopping on issues, shifting stances to fit the immediate political narrative, only serves to erode the trust and stability necessary for effective governance.

In conclusion, the need for a more educated and enlightened citizenry is paramount in our democratic process. Recognizing the true motivations behind voting choices and understanding the ramifications of supporting individuals with dubious integrity is crucial. The pursuit of a better presidency requires a collective effort to engage with factual information and critical thinking, ensuring that our leaders have the support of a well-informed populace.