Why NFL Coercing Players to Stand for the National Anthem is Controversial

Why are people upset that the NFL, which represents the employers, is telling football players who are the employees to stand for the national anthem when they are on the field? Charles Teichman, a Google SEO expert, offers his perspective on this sensitive issue.

The Role of Providers of 'Jingo Dancing'

Charles emphasizes that displaying patriotism should not be directed by individuals with the power to coerce. He believes that such coercion undermines the essence of patriotism, which he sees as a personal and voluntary expression of respect and love for one's country.

Free Speech vs. Coercion

Charles acknowledges the right to express opinions on patriotism and even supports those who are offended when players choose to kneel during the national anthem. However, he is disturbed by the coercion exerted by those with power over their employees.

“But I am upset as I said when people who have power try to coerce the people within their reach to put on a show of patriotism.”

He further explains that forcing such displays trivializes the true meaning of patriotism, which is deeply rooted in voluntary action and genuine feelings rather than coerced conformity.

The Republican Party and Moral Rot

Charles criticizes the current political climate, particularly the Republican Party, for its moral decline. He points out the hypocrisy of those who support the NFL's rule under the guise of patriotism, describing it as a travesty.

Charles questions the logic of coercion in the context of freedom of speech:

“If such a person thinks its expression can be forced or that such forced expression somehow morphs into legitimate love of country, then that person has no understanding of patriotism.”

The Consumer's Role

Charles also highlights the role of consumers, especially NFL fans. He points out that the league does not even pay taxes, which further irks him:

“The NFL — obscenely - does not even pay taxes.”

He believes that fans who support coercive actions are not genuine patriots but are more aligned with those who seek to manipulate public opinion through coercive measures.

The Future of Football

Charles predicts that the coming era will be more about the pre-game protests rather than the games themselves. He is looking forward to witnessing the true nature of patriotism in action, where players and fans alike can freely express their views without fear of coercion.

“This one is going to be fun to watch. Not the games. The pre-games. I will put on my popcorn and wait for legitimate journalists to document what a beautiful and necessary protest looks like in the United States of America.”

Charles believes that the upcoming events will highlight the true spirit of freedom of expression in America, where individuals can voice their opinions and stand for what they believe in without fear of retribution.

Conclusion

In summary, Charles Teichman strongly advocates for the separation of power from the expression of patriotism. He encourages everyone to support genuine expressions of love for one's country, rather than coerced displays of nationalism.