Why NATO Allows Turkey to Invade Syria: A Closer Look at the Complexities

The question of why NATO, particularly Turkey, is involved in invasions in Syria is a multifaceted one, raising important points about accountability, foreign policy, and the nature of defense alliances.

NATO's Role and Limitations

My perspective, stemming from a general viewpoint, suggests that NATO does not 'let' or 'forbid' its members from invading other nations. NATO's operational scope is defined both legally and in practice. NATO is limited in what it can do in any crisis situation, reflecting its collective objectives and constraints.

When it comes to Turkey's actions in Syria, it is important to understand that these actions are rooted in complex geopolitical realities. Turkey is part of NATO but operates within the framework of its own national interests. While NATO as a whole may not directly sanction or condone Turkey's actions, it is crucial to consider the broader context and the influence of other major powers, especially the United States.

Turkey's Actions and the Justifications

Turkey is not simply invading Syria; it is creating a safe zone to repatriate at least half of the four million Syrian refugees back to their homeland. This safe zone is also intended to prevent attacks from terrorist organizations like the PKK, YPG, SDF, PYD, and ISIS, which are supported by countries such as the United States, France, the UK, Canada, and Israel. The current US president has admitted that many civilians have been killed by these attacks, highlighting the urgency and necessity of a buffer zone.

Furthermore, according to the United Nations' rules, Turkey has the right to act in self-defense. These actions are complex and multifaceted, involving complex security concerns and humanitarian objectives. The lack of understanding of these nuances often leads to oversimplification and misunderstanding of Turkey's strategic actions.

NATO's Complicity in Syria

It is important to note that NATO has supported the US in its violation of Syrian sovereignty. Turkey, as a proud member of NATO, has taken actions that are aligned with the US's broader objectives in the region. The NATO alliance, particularly under the influence of the US, has been complicit in the years-long conflict in Syria. The promotion of a Kurdish state in Syria by the US-led SDF is not under NATO's direct control, which complicates the understanding of NATO's role in the region.

The recent Turkish incursion into Syria can be seen as a response to the US's actions in supporting the Kurds. Turkey has been promised by the US that this incursion is only about establishing a buffer zone to protect the Turkish side from the SDF/Kurdish forces. This alignment of interests between NATO and the US raises questions about the true purpose and impact of these actions on the ground.

Conclusion

The actions of NATO and its members, particularly Turkey, in Syria are complex and multi-layered. Understanding these actions requires a deep dive into geopolitical realities, national interests, and the influence of major powers. While Turkey's actions may be justified from a national security perspective, the broader implications of these actions on regional stability and international law remain a cause for concern. Understanding the context and nuances is crucial to forming a well-rounded perspective on the situation.