Why Millionaires and Billionaires Often Do Not Help Those in Need

Justice, or the lack thereof, is a theme that has echoed through the corridors of human history. The New Testament suggests a world where only a few enjoy a heaven on earth, while others are left to gnash their teeth in despair.

Unfair Wealth and Entitlement

In our contemporary society, the disparity between the ultra-wealthy and the less fortunate remains stark. Millionaires, billionaires, and even trillionaires have a different perspective on who "needs help." According to those who delve into the depths of this issue, there is a significant difference between those who inherit vast fortunes and those who earn them:

The more wealth you have, the more it fosters a sense of entitlement, which is one of the primary roots of selfishness, or narcissism.

Entitlement often goes hand in hand with a perception that the wealthy have a God-given right to their riches and that they should retain them. This can be seen in various legal and social contexts, such as the recent Supreme Court case that is drawing much attention.

Reservations About Direct Help

Let's consider the broader picture. Many wealthy individuals, especially those who are self-made, like to support community charities and organizations. Some even create their own charities to help others. However, when it comes to giving direct financial aid to individuals in need, they often hesitate. There is a fundamental trust issue—they do not want to risk their resources on individuals whose claims to need help may be dubious.

They don't know if the individuals are truly needy, so they let the charities do the job of vetting those who are scamming from those who honestly deserve help.

This leaves many in a state of limbo, with genuine needs unattended. It's a ethical and social quandary that reflects a broader issue in our capitalist society.

Alternative Solutions: Creating More Winners

Instead of relying on the occasional act of charity from the ultra-wealthy, one solution that has been suggested is creating a more widespread distribution of wealth through lotteries. The idea is to introduce smaller LOTTO winnings, such as one billion dollars divided among one thousand winners, giving more people a chance to become millionaires.

One billion dollars equals 1,000 million dollar winners. It gives more people a shot at being a millionaire.

In the United States, the rags-to-riches story is a familiar narrative, often rooted in hard work and innovative ideas. However, the reluctance of many to give away their riches is understandable. Many millionaires and billionaires value their hard-earned wealth and the fruits of their labor. They see no compelling reason to part with a significant portion of their hard-earned assets.

Maximizing LOTTO Winnings for Broader Impact

Another solution could be to maximize LOTTO winnings to 10 million dollars. This way, more people could win and gain financial freedom. While some dreamers might think one million dollars would be enough, the reality is that a larger sum can sometimes provide the necessary boost to change lives fundamentally.

In California, the lottery can go as high as one billion dollars, and the state takes half of the money, still taxing the winner. Something is wrong with that picture. We should have smaller lotto winnings to give more people more chances to win and get an infusion of cash into their lives.

Addressing wealth disparity in this manner would not only provide financial security to more individuals but also encourage a more equitable distribution of resources. It would give hope to those who are working hard but still struggle to make ends meet, and it would challenge the status quo of the capitalist system.

Conclusion

While the issues surrounding wealth and philanthropy are complex, solutions like redistributing lottery winnings could be a step towards a more equitable society. It's a matter of balancing individual success with collective responsibility, ensuring that everyone has the chance to thrive.