Why Did Trump Fire Defense Secretary Esper in the Final Days of His Presidency?

Rumors and speculations have swirled around the U.S. presidency throughout its term. From political maneuverings to the sudden departures of high-ranking officials, the 45th U.S. president, Donald Trump, left quite a few headlines behind. One such notable event is the firing of Secretary of Defense Mark Esper in the closing days of Trump's presidency. Why did Trump decide to terminate the tenure of one of his key advisors, especially so late in his term?

The Departure of Mark Esper

The departure of Secretary Esper came as a surprise to many, given that his resignation was reportedly prepared for some time. This move had significant ramifications for both domestic and international security policies. According to insiders, Esper had already drafted his resignation letter because of his disagreement with the administration's use of defense resources for political purposes. His opposition to these actions underscores a critical shift in Trump's administration's approach to defense matters.

The initial tipping point appears to have been the phrase "American streets as battle space." Esper’s public statement caused controversy, reflecting a noticeable shift in his willingness to align completely with the administration's narrative. His reluctance to invoke the Insurrection Act also played a significant role, as it was seen as a refusal to fully support Trump's political ambitions.

Understanding Trump's Motivations

Some might argue that Trump's decision to fire Esper was driven by a combination of personal and strategic factors. Trump's personality is known for its unpredictability and egocentrism. He values compliance and loyalty and is quick to remove individuals who do not align with his agenda. It is also worth noting that Esper's reluctance to fully support Trump's political agenda could be interpreted as a form of obstruction, which is unacceptable in Trump's view.

Adding to the mix, there were reports suggesting that Esper's public statements were critical of Trump. One specific instance was when Esper referred to American streets as "battle space," a term he later regretted. This language is significant because it highlights a divide between Esper's approach to security and the administration's more aggressive stance. Another potential trigger was Esper's opposition to declaring martial law, a power that Trump was eager to claim.

The Psychological Aspect: Trump as a 'Spoiled Child'

Ironically, the reasons behind Trump's decision to fire Esper can also be tied to a psychological aspect of his character. Trump's behavior can be compared to that of a 70-year-old child who is easily frustrated and lashed out when faced with opposition or criticism. This impulsive and revenge-seeking behavior is reminiscent of tantrums seen in younger children and toddlers who struggle to cope with failure or rejections.

Given Trump's belief in his own infallibility, any perceived failure or opposition, especially in the closing days of his presidency, became intolerable. In his mind, he views himself as unbeatable. This mindset likely led him to act rashly and settle scores with those who opposed him, whether through policy decisions or personnel changes. Esper, with his opposition to certain policies and his professional integrity, became a convenient target for Trump's frustration.

Conclusion

The firing of Secretary Esper in the closing days of Trump's presidency can be understood through a combination of personal and strategic motivations. His departure marked a significant shift in Trump's approach to defense matters, with a clear emphasis on political over strategic considerations. For Trump, it is often about asserting control and punishing those who oppose him, even if it is late in his term. Understanding this dynamic helps shed light on the complexities of modern political leadership and the often unpredictable nature of presidential decision-making.