Introduction

You are absolutely right, but it is only due to the promotion done by coaching centers and some teachers. However, choosing any service is not based on the candidate; it solely depends on rank. If anyone wants to serve as IFS and gives priority to IFS over IAS, then only it's possible.

Moreover, according to a few foreign policy experts in India, IFS officers often serve due to compulsion and not by choice.

Contrary Beliefs

Believing that IAS is more glamorous than IFS is a misconception. My first preference was IFS when I appeared in the interview on 17th August 1992. When asked to explain why I chose IFS over IAS, I mentioned that IFS is more glamorous. I further explained that an IFS officer can become an ambassador and have direct dealings with heads of state and heads of government. Now, I realize that IFS has other advantages over IAS:

No corruption in IFS. An IFS officer is placed in national capitals or other big cities and moves in high society. No political interference. An IFS officer deals only with the foreign minister and the prime minister, not local mantris or MLAs.

The only advantage IAS has is that an IAS officer can be placed in any department and at any level from the district to the central government, not just in the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).

Why CSE Aspirants Prefer IAS to IFS

Civil Services Examination (CSE) aspirants often prefer the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) over the Indian Foreign Service (IFS) despite the latter being perceived as more glamorous. Here are some key factors influencing this preference:

Diverse Responsibilities

IAS officers have a broader range of responsibilities, including policy formulation and implementation of government programs and administrative functions at various levels. This diversity can be more appealing to those who want to make a significant impact on their communities and the country.

Domestic Focus

Many aspirants are motivated to work on issues directly affecting their local communities and the nation. IAS officers are often involved in developmental work, disaster management, and local governance, which allows them to see the tangible results of their efforts.

Career Progression

The career trajectory in the IAS is generally more straightforward in terms of promotions and responsibilities. IAS officers typically have a clearer path to higher administrative positions, whereas IFS officers may have more limited options for advancement.

Work-Life Balance

While both services demand hard work, IAS officers often have more predictable work hours compared to IFS officers who may face extended periods abroad and unpredictable schedules.

Influence and Power

The IAS is often seen as the backbone of the Indian administrative system, giving officers significant influence over policy-making and governance. Many aspirants are drawn to the power and authority associated with IAS roles.

Personal Aspirations

Individual aspirations and interests play a significant role. Some candidates may have a passion for governance, public administration, or social service that aligns more closely with the IAS than the IFS.

Preparation and Guidance

Many coaching institutes and resources are more geared toward IAS preparation, making it a more accessible and attractive option for aspirants.

Job Security

Both services offer job security, but the IAS is often perceived as more stable given its central role in the Indian government.

Conclusion

While the IFS is indeed prestigious and offers unique experiences, particularly in diplomacy and international relations, the IAS's broader scope and immediate impact on society often resonate more with aspirants. The choice between IAS and IFS ultimately depends on individual aspirations and career goals, rather than glamorous perceptions or external promotion.