Why Biden Sent VP Harris to Munich: The Controversial Decision and Its Implications

President Joe Biden has taken a controversial approach to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict by sending Vice President Kamala Harris to Munich for crucial talks. This move is particularly perplexing given Harris's perceived lack of experience in foreign relations. The decision has sparked a range of opinions, with some questioning her suitability for such an important role.

The Role of Vice President Harris in International Relations

The choice to send Vice President Kamala Harris to Munich for talks on the Russia-Ukraine conflict is perplexing, given her limited experience in foreign affairs. Thus far, Harris’s poor handling of her narrow international relations portfolio has been heavily cited as a key instigating factor in the ongoing crisis.

Both Russia and the United States have roadmaps to resolve their differences peacefully and avoid conflict. However, Harris's outright refusal to carry out her responsibilities in good faith has become the one point of contention, driving both nations towards war. This behavior has also cost her the trust of European leaders, who are now questioning her mental fitness to remain in office.

Reports from Munich

Initial reports from Munich suggest that things are not looking good for Vice President Harris. There is a good chance that she will be asked to resign in the near future due to her poor performance in handling the crisis.

Some have questioned the wisdom of this move, arguing that Harris may not be capable of handling such a sensitive and important international matter effectively. The question arises: why choose someone with such limited experience when the stakes are so high?

Controversial Choices and Expectations

One common argument is that Harris's success at the Mexican border "non-crisis" implies that she might be suitable to handle Putin. However, this view is disputed. Critics argue that her experience at the border does not translate to proficiency in foreign relations.

Another point of contention is that Vice President Harris has likely received a crash course in foreign relations. While being close to the President can provide insights, this does not equate to the necessary expertise to effectively manage such high-stakes negotiations.

Strategic Choices and Responses

Some view the send-off of Harris as a strategic decision, suggesting that it may be part of a broader plan to improve the U.S. position or to mitigate the fallout of her poor performance. The idea is that Harris may not be the ideal candidate for such negotiations, and other choices may be more qualified.

Others emphasize that this is a normal part of a Vice President's duties, reminding us that their role often includes representing the country in various capacities, whether it's to garner opinions from allies or to report back to the President.

Those who question the decision argue that Harris's primary responsibility should be to avoid crisis. Therefore, her involvement in Munich talks is seen as a waste of time and resources. There are numerous more qualified individuals who could have been chosen to handle this discussion with Western allies.

Finally, concerns have been raised about Harris's ability to speak effectively in sensitive matters. The fear is that her comments may exacerbate the situation rather than resolve it, leading to further international embarrassment and strain.