Why Are NFL Running Backs Not Getting Paid Like They Deserve?

The perception that NFL running backs are underpaid or underappreciated is widespread, stemming from a combination of factors related to their position's demanding nature, changes in the strategic approach of the modern NFL, and budget constraints imposed by the salary cap. This article explores the reasons behind this perception and discusses the challenges faced by running backs in the league.

The Short Shelf Life of Running Backs

One significant reason for the underpayment of running backs is the short shelf life of their careers. The physically demanding nature of the position makes it highly demanding on players' bodies, leading teams to be cautious with their investments. Many top-tier running backs face injuries early in their careers, and burn out quickly. As a result, teams are hesitant to invest large sums of money into a position that may not provide a long-term return.

The NFL's Shifting Focus to Passing and Passing-Oriented Strategies

The modern NFL is much more pass-oriented than in previous decades, with the passing game taking precedence over the running game. This change has diminished the traditional value of individual running backs. With the emphasis on throwing the ball downfield and the rise of quarterback-centric offenses, elite quarterbacks are now often seen as having more value than top-tier running backs. Consequently, teams may be more inclined to invest their resources in other positions, such as tackle and tight end, that are seen as more integral to a passing-oriented strategy.

The Rise of the Running Back Committee

Another factor contributing to the perception of running backs being undervalued is the trend of running back by committee. In committee backfields, teams distribute carries among multiple running backs, which can be more cost-effective. This approach is particularly attractive if the running game is viewed as largely offensive line-dependent. In such situations, having three decent running backs splitting the carries can be more strategic than investing in one elite back. While this approach can be effective, it may not align with the pursuit of top-tier talent, contributing to the perception of running backs as underpaid.

The Case of Saquon Barkley and the Giants

The recent news involving Saquon Barkley and the New York Giants has brought renewed attention to the issue of running back compensation. The NFL has a reputation for being "pass happy," with a strong emphasis on the passing game. As a result, the running game has often taken a back seat. In this environment, elite runners are now expected to contribute to the passing game through blocking and receiving, which has shifted the perception of their value.

The Role of Coaches and the Salary Cap

The relentless pursuit of winning by coaches, combined with the hard salary cap, often leads to strategic decisions that impact running back compensation. Coaches are acutely aware of the diminishing returns associated with long-term running back investments, and they must manage limited financial resources accordingly. In such an environment, it's logical for teams to prioritize other positions that offer a higher return on investment, further contributing to the perception of running backs as underpaid.

Conclusion

While running backs play a crucial role in the NFL, the perceived undervaluation of their position is a multifaceted issue. Factors such as the physically demanding nature of the position, the NFL's pass-oriented tactics, the rise of running back by committee, and the hard salary cap all contribute to the debate surrounding running back compensation. As the league evolves, it will be interesting to see how these factors manifest and whether the perceived undervaluation of running backs can be addressed.