Why 20 Republicans Voted with Democrats to Stop Censure of Adam Schiff

Introduction

Why did more than 20 Republicans vote with Democrats to stop the censure resolution against Representative Adam Schiff? This article delves deeper into the motivations behind their actions, offering insights into political integrity, procedural fairness, and the impact on future elections.

Reasons for Democratic Alignment

Integrity and Common Sense

One significant reason is that these 20 Republicans possess functional 'bull-shyte detectors,' enabling them to see through the hollow and political nature of the censure action. The idea that such an action could be used as a political revenge weapon is a compelling reason to oppose it. As Representative Adam Schiff continues to serve effectively, it's clear that the censure was more about partisanship than actual misconduct.

Political Calculus

There is also a strategic element at play. By forgoing censure, these Republican representatives may be paving the way for Schiff to have a stronger political position. Schiff's election campaign for the Senate next year could be significantly bolstered if he leaves office, forcing him to return to California to work for a living. This could shift focus away from partisan warfare and towards addressing public issues effectively, showcasing integrity and leadership.

Identifying the RINO's

Rejection of Republican Integrity Officers (RINO)

The term 'RINO trash' highlights a subset of Republicans who do not adhere to party lines but instead act with integrity. These 20 individuals recognize that the censure resolution was unwarranted and politically motivated. By voting with Democrats, they demonstrate a commitment to procedural fairness and a refusal to be complicit in partisan witch hunts. This action further cements their status as 'RINO’s' (Republican In Name Only), making them targets for retribution in a future election.

Political Consequences

These votes also have significant implications for the future. If such vetoing of censure resolutions becomes a precedent, it could limit the ability of the majority party to engage in partisan retaliation. This could lead to a more stable and less confrontational political environment, encouraging constructive dialogue and cooperation rather than political vendettas.

Public Perception and Capable Leadership

Absence of Malfeasance

Another key factor is the recognition that Adam Schiff has performed his duties admirably. His loyalty to the public and the nation is commendable, and this is underscored by the actions of these 20 Republicans. By voting against censure, they acknowledge Schiff's integrity and professionalism. Schiff's conduct has not only been effective but also reflective of the public trust placed in him.

Tribalism and Racial Prejudice

It is also noteworthy that the opposition to censure by these Republicans transcends tribalism. It reflects a broader recognition that political games, such as censures, only serve to divide the nation and create a toxic political atmosphere. In Schiff's district, which is predominantly 'civilized' and does not condone such behavior, these representatives are being held accountable. Their votes reflect a commitment torepresent the will of their constituents rather than party lines.

Conclusion

The decision of these 20 Republicans to align with Democrats in blocking the censure resolution against Adam Schiff is a testament to political integrity and a commitment to procedural fairness. This action not only reflects their personal integrity but also sets a precedent for future political conduct in the Senate. By opposing the censure, they ensure that political actions remain focused on genuine misconduct and are not weaponized for political advantage.