The Worst Questions to Ask a Potential PhD Advisor

While it is important to approach your PhD journey with a well-informed mindset, some questions can make the situation awkward and may not yield the most beneficial information. Here, we explore some of the worst questions you can ask a potential PhD advisor and why they should be avoided.

The Dangers of Uninformed Questions

The worst questions to ask a potential PhD advisor often revolve around matters that are either too personal, focused on immediate outcomes, or designed to test the advisor's character inappropriately. These inquiries can make a candidate appear unprepared or inconsiderate, potentially damaging the relationship before it has a chance to grow.

Unrealistic Expectations and Immediate Answers

Startling questions such as "How secure is my funding?" or "How long do I have to stay before they give me a Master's degree?" reveal a lack of trust and preparation. They suggest a mindset where success is primarily measured by short-term gains and instant gratification. Additionally, questions like 'Am I your favorite student?' and 'Did your supervisor treat you like this?' are purely personal and unprofessional, aiming to gauge an advisor's character rather than their suitability for your academic journey.

Unsolicited Curiosity and Personal Probes

Academic interviews are not the place for inappropriate personal questions, such as 'Can I be exempted from TAing?' or 'How hard do I have to work?' These inquiries can appear as an attempt to manipulate the situation to one's advantage, which is counterproductive. Similar to the example of making out or discussing a pornographic film, such questions might be considered derogatory and unprofessional.

Unsatisfactory Past Performance and Ethical Concerns

Asking questions like 'Do you still publish?' or 'Are you relevant?' reflect a negative outlook on the advisor's current work or past achievements. It also demonstrates a lack of trust and a focus on the advisor's past rather than their current and future contributions. Raising ethical concerns through inquiries such as 'Did you check that proof in my paper carefully?' or 'Can you make bail for me?' can be seen as an attempt to manipulate the advisor's judgment or trust.

Understanding the Advisor's Research and Expectations

The best questions, on the other hand, are those that focus on the advisor's research interests, mentoring style, lab culture, and how the student's goals align with the program. This approach demonstrates a genuine interest in the work and a willingness to put in the effort required for a successful PhD. For instance, asking about research opportunities, support structures, and transparent information about funding can provide valuable insights into the advisor's and program's capabilities and expectations.

Lessons from Real Experiences

Sue Donem's answers to such questions highlight the importance of avoiding unprofessional and inappropriate inquiries. For instance, Donem's response to questions about her worst graduate school experience and unethical practices in academia underscores the negative implications of such questions.

Conclusion

When interviewing potential PhD advisors, focus on building a genuine, professional relationship that fosters growth and mutual respect. Avoid asking questions that reveal a lack of preparation, inappropriate curiosity, or unethical concerns. Instead, aim to learn about the advisor's research, program, and how you can contribute positively to the academic environment. This approach will help establish a solid foundation for a successful and enriching PhD journey.