The Trump Administration's Inhumane Approach to Endangered Species Protection

Under the current administration, environmental protection and conservation efforts for endangered species have faced unprecedented challenges. The priorities of the Trump administration, as reflected in their policies and actions, starkly conflict with the preservation of these vulnerable species. This article delves into how the administration's philosophy towards environmental issues undermines the very essence of conservation efforts.

Value System of the Trump Administration

When examining the priorities of the Trump administration, it is clear that the values placed on individuals and personal gain are paramount. This can be summarized in a list that ranks their values as follows:

Themselves Their personal fortunes The personal fortunes of people who can be of use to them People who can be used

The logic behind this prioritization is simple: anything that does not fall within these categories is deemed irrelevant. This mindset extends to endangered species, which the administration views merely as obstacles to resource exploitation. This perspective deeply impacts the survival and well-being of these animals.

Stripping Value from Non-Resource Species

According to President Trump, there is no value in anything that cannot be bought and sold. This idea shapes the administration's policies and actions, making them highly detrimental to species that do not contribute to the economy or serve political interests. The administration is willing to remove these obstacles through any means necessary, as they perceive them as barriers to progress.

In the United States, there are numerous endangered species that have been affecting resource allocation, making them a target for removal. The administration's argument is that any resource currently tied up by these species should be freed up for more valuable uses, such as funding for border walls or benefiting the wealthy.

Exceptional Cases and Athletic Pursuits

The administration does recognize a few instances where endangered species may hold value beyond their commercial worth. These exceptions include situations where species can be utilized for hunting, particularly as trophies, or when their conservation requires significant financial investment. In these cases, the species may be overlooked to some extent. For instance, if the species in question provides excellent hunting opportunities or if it costs too much money to protect, the administration prefers to allocate funds to other uses, such as constructing walls or aiding the wealthy.

Conclusion: A Resounding 'Yes'

Based on their actions, the answer to the question of the administration's stance on endangered species is a resounding 'yes': they are indeed determined to remove any species that do not align with their exploitative agenda. This resolute approach not only jeopardizes the survival of endangered species but also violates the fundamental principles of environmental ethics and conservation.

The actions and policies of the Trump administration have profound implications for the future of biodiversity and ecological sustainability. It is crucial to recognize and challenge these policies to ensure the preservation of our planet's vulnerable species for future generations.