The Pros and Cons of Using Real Job Interviews for Technical Practice

Many individuals and job seekers rely on real job interviews as a means to practice and refine their technical skills for future job interviews. This approach, while seemingly logical, comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. This article explores these aspects in detail to help you make an informed decision.

Pros of Using Real Job Interviews for Technical Practice

While it might seem that there are no pros to using real job interviews as a means of technical practice, let's delve into why some may still find value in this method.

Increased Relevance

The primary appeal of using real job interviews is the relevance of the questions and scenarios. Unlike practice tests or self-assessment quizzes, real interviews provide a more authentic experience. Since the questions asked are genuinely posed by hiring managers, they are likely to be directly related to the job and the industry. This can lead to a more accurate prediction of what you might face in the actual interview process.

Less Dependency on Prep

With real interviews, candidates don't have to rely entirely on memorized answers or pre-prepared scripts. The dynamic environment of a real interview encourages on-the-spot thinking and creative problem-solving. This can be particularly beneficial for those who need to demonstrate their ability to think on their feet and handle unexpected scenarios.

Cons of Using Real Job Interviews for Technical Practice

Despite the potential benefits, using real job interviews as a practice method also comes with significant drawbacks. Let's explore these in more detail.

Time Consumption

The primary disadvantage of using real job interviews is the sheer time commitment involved. Setting up an interview can be a lengthy process, involving numerous emails, phone calls, and coordination with sourcers, recruiters, and recruitment coordinators. Even after finding a willing partner for the interview, the interviewing itself can be time-consuming and energy-draining. Preparing for a real interview requires extensive research and practice, all while juggling other commitments.

Inconsistent Practice Material

Real job interviews are often unique to each company and vary in style and format. What works for one company may not translate to another. This inconsistency can make it difficult to develop a consistent and effective preparation strategy. Moreover, if one does not intend to take the job, the mindset and approach to the interview can differ, leading to an inconsistent practice environment.

Conclusion

While real job interviews offer a highly relevant and authentic practice scenario, the time and energy required to set them up can be prohibitive. Additionally, the inconsistency in interview formats can make it challenging to develop a consistent preparation strategy.

Instead of relying on real job interviews alone, consider using a combination of methods. Practice with realistic mock interviews, use industry-specific resources, and seek feedback from mentors or experienced professionals. This balanced approach can provide a more comprehensive and efficient learning experience.

Maintaining a healthy balance between authenticity and efficiency in your preparation is key to excelling in technical interviews.