The Necessity of Article 35A in the Indian Constitution
The Necessity of Article 35A in the Indian Constitution
Article 35A of the Indian Constitution, introduced by a presidential order in 1954, grants the Special Status to the State of JK, ensuring its unique rights and privileges. This article has been a subject of legal and political debate, with some questioning its necessity and legality. However, a thorough analysis reveals that the article serves a critical purpose, particularly given the unique geographical and strategic importance of JK.
Introduction of Article 35A
Article 35A, initially introduced as a presidential order, allows the Government of JK to identify the permanent residents of the state and to grant them exclusive property rights, as well as various special benefits in employment, scholarship, and other civic matters. This provision seeks to protect the distinct cultural and geographical identity of the state.
Legal Challenges and Fundamental Rights
Several petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court challenging both Article 35A and the special status of JK, claiming that it is against the fundamental right to equality. These claims are indeed pertinent, as the Constitution of India enshrines the principle of equality. However, it is crucial to understand the unique circumstances that necessitate such special provisions.
The special status of JK can be compared to that of other northeastern states, which also have special grants and status due to their unique geographical terrain. For instance, the northeastern states have special provisions under the 7th Schedule of the Constitution, which governs the distribution of legislative powers between the Centre and the states. Similarly, JK has specific constitutional provisions tailored to its unique needs.
Article 35A and Article 368
Another point of contention regarding Article 35A is the claim that it was not approved by a parliamentary order, which is deemed a misconception. Article 370, which grants immense powers to the President and the Council of Ministers to extend the provisions of the Indian Constitution to JK, does not override Article 35A. In fact, Article 35A is an essential and necessary part of the Indian Constitution, as it complements and aligns with Article 368.
Article 368 empowers the Union Parliament to make any amendment in the Constitution, but with certain exceptions, such as the states' territories and boundaries, the emergency provisions (prior to 1976), and certain provisions related to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Article 35A falls outside these exceptions, and hence remains a valid and constitutional provision.
Strategic Importance of JK and Its Special Status
Given JK's strategic importance, its status as a frontier state, and its unique cultural and historical identity, the special provisions under Article 35A play a crucial role. Removing the special status of JK would not only be a blow to the country's unity and integrity but would also have profound consequences for the state's stability and development.
The unique geographical terrain and the distinct cultural legacy of JK necessitate a tailored approach to governance, as these factors influence the state's development and integration with the rest of India. The special status provided by Article 35A ensures that JK's unique needs are met, fostering a conducive environment for its growth and development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Article 35A is not an alien provision but a well-integrated part of the Indian Constitution, designed to protect the distinct identity and interests of JK. It aligns with the broader principles of the Constitution and is necessary to preserve the special status and autonomy of JK. Any attempts to alter or remove these provisions should be approached with a clear understanding of the state's unique circumstances and the potential ramifications such changes may have on the nation's unity and stability.