The Legend of the 'Goat' at US Military Academies: Understanding the Myth

The term 'goat' has become a familiar phrase in the lexicon of US military academies, often used to describe students who intentionally aim to perform the worst in their graduating class. This article explores the truth behind the legend, examining historical practices, the challenges involved, and the career paths such students might pursue.

The Tradition and Myths of the 'Goat'

At the service academies, it is traditional for the graduating classes to pay the “goat” a dollar per person, resulting in a significant sum that goes to the student in the last place. This practice has been observed over the years, with many stories and anecdotes circulating about students who intentionally struggle to achieve this dubious honor. However, the reality of such a goal is often more complex.

For example, years ago, a newspaper article identified a West Point student who was vying for the goat title. This student wasn't entirely joking when he claimed it was a struggle to keep his grades low enough to stay at the bottom without failing the class and not graduating. The political climate at the time, with the Vietnam War still ongoing, meant that the goat was almost assuredly destined for the infantry.

Unfortunately, without access to his name, the article couldn't provide any information on his survival. Similar practices have been documented at other academies, such as the Naval Academy, culminating in the 'anchorman' tradition, where the student with the lowest GPA and the First place student divide the pot.

Truth or Myth: The Reality of the 'Goat'

For many, the idea of intentionally performing poorly might seem absurd. However, in certain cases, this myth is based on reality. The story of LT Dan, a 1LT who graduated from West Point, is a prime example. LT Dan intentionally aimed to be the last in his class by throwing money into a pot with his classmates. The winner and the lowest scorer would split the amount.

LT Dan was always under academic probation and had to be constantly on guard to avoid being called to the office and being told to pack his things. This challenge made it harder for him to be last than to be first, as any sudden improvement could jeopardize his standing. Despite these challenges, LT Dan successfully managed to achieve his goal and even managed to buy a car with the money he won.

However, it is important to note that difficulties in achieving the 'goat' or 'anchorman' status don't necessarily mean that students intentionally perform poorly. The pressures of strict academic standards, competitive environments, and the fear of academic probation can make it challenging for even the most diligent students.

The Aftermath: Careers and Obstacles

Despite the attention and resources dedicated to achieving the 'goat' status, the success of such students in the military and beyond is often limited. Graduate degrees through Uncle Sam or becoming a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are not feasible paths for the 'goat.' Once they fulfill their military obligation, many return to civilian life.

Famous examples of 'anchormen' include future Senator John McCain, adding a layer of complexity to the myth. While such students may face additional challenges in military life, their stories are often romanticized and inspire other students to aim for the last place as a form of rebellion against the demanding academic environment.

For current cadets or midshipmen, the reality is that the pressures to excel are high. The idea of intentionally performing poorly is not only irrational but also a risk of not graduating at all. The 'goat' or 'anchorman' status is a product of the competitive environment at the service academies and the traditions that have developed over time.

In conclusion, while the 'goat' myth is rooted in tradition and some instances of reality, it is essential to understand that achieving such a status is not a common or easy feat. The focus should be on excelling and fulfilling the duties required of military leaders, rather than engaging in aimless rebellion.