The Inherent Rights of the Individual: Origin, Definition, and Implications

When discussing the origins of human rights, one must first examine the moment at which a person's inherent rights come into existence. Are these rights present from the moment of birth, or is there a point in a person's development when these fundamental rights manifest? This article explores the nature of inherent rights, the physical embodiment of a human individual, and the implications of separating an individual from a part of their physical body.

The Origin of Inherent Rights

The concept of inherent rights, or inalienable rights, is deeply rooted in philosophical and legal discourse. These rights are believed to be present from birth, inherent to the individual immediately upon their physical existence. This raises the question of whether the moment of birth marks the simultaneous creation of a complete and intact human form, including both the physical body and the rights associated with it.

It is essential to understand that the physical body and inherent rights are not separate entities but rather an interconnected whole. This interconnection is so fundamental that any attempt to separate the two would lead to the collapse of the entire system. For instance, separating a person's arm from their shoulder would not merely cause physical harm but would also render the severed arm non-viable and unable to function as a separate entity. This interdependence underscores the indivisibility of both the physical body and the rights associated with it.

Physical Embodiment and Human Rights

The physical embodiment of a human being is not merely a collection of physical parts but a living, breathing entity with inherent rights. These rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are not contingent upon external factors but are intrinsic to the human condition. Thus, the moment a human being's first breath is taken, their inherent rights come into existence.

Some argue that a portion of a human can be considered less than a whole individual, but this perspective misunderstands the indivisibility of human rights. If a human being's body is divided, the resulting parts are no longer capable of exercising the complete array of inherent rights. Each part is rendered incapable of independent existence and thus cannot claim the full spectrum of human rights.

The Equality of Human Rights

The assertion that all individuals should be treated equally and with respect based on their humanity is a fundamental principle. Just as the arm is not a separate entity from the body but an integral part, an individual cannot be treated as half a person or a lesser individual. Each human being, regardless of their physical condition, should be treated as a full and complete individual with the full suite of inherent rights.

The implications of this belief are far-reaching. It challenges systems and practices that discriminate based on physical or mental conditions, advocating for the equality and dignity of all individuals. This principle underpins various legal frameworks, including disability rights, and shapes ethical and moral considerations in society.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the inherent rights of the individual are a natural and inherent component of their physical embodiment, coexisting and inseparable from the moment of birth. Any attempt to separate an individual from a part of their physical body, leading to the demise of one or both parts, reveals the indivisibility of the physical form and the rights associated with it. Therefore, all humans should be treated as full individuals, enjoying the complete spectrum of inherent rights, by virtue of their humanity.