The Dumbest Pet Question: An Elder’s Perspective on Job Interviews

Job interviews can be challenging and sometimes even surprising, but the "choose your animal" question might just take the cake. I recently encountered this peculiar question from an interviewer, and I must admit, it left me quite perplexed and frustrated. I am not alone in my frustration; many professionals have shared their disdain for such nonsensical questions.

Why Is the Animal Question So Dumb?

When interviewers ask candidates to choose an animal and explain their choice, they are typically looking for insights into self-awareness, suitability for the company culture, critical thinking, and communication skills. However, upon closer inspection, the question is anything but insightful or relevant to the interview process.

The Interviewer's Frustration

The interviewer in question had clearly read an article about 'creative interviewing' or a pop psychology fad. The idea that an animal could symbolize one's personality traits is deeply flawed. There is no hidden meaning, and the question has no bearing on the candidate's ability to perform specific job tasks. This question not only wastes everyone's time but also fails to provide any meaningful insight into the candidate's qualifications.

The Interviewer's Lack of Experience

As my response indicates, the interviewer's approach suggests a lack of training and experience. It is disheartening to see an interview panel incapable of asking straightforward, relevant questions about a candidate's abilities and suitability for a role. Such an unprofessional approach reflects poorly on the company's hiring standards.

Misleading or Uninformed Expectations

Interviewers who ask such frivolous questions might believe they are engaging the candidate in an innovative and creative dialogue. However, the reality is that these questions do nothing to assess the candidate's skills, experience, or alignment with the company. This type of questioning can be seen as a sign that the interviewer is misinformed or does not understand the role they are hiring for.

My Personal Encounter

During my recent interview, the interviewer posed the question, "Could you be a pet and which type would you choose?" This question was not only bizarre but also insulting. It implied that I would have a choice, when in reality, being a pet is a status imposed upon an individual by their owner. I chose not to become someone's pet, valuing my freedom and the responsibility to look after myself. Even if being a pet meant being protected and sheltered, I would prefer the freedom and the ability to care for myself.

My Argument for Independence

I have owned various pets over the years and currently have a pet dog. While I acknowledge that most of these pets have been bred to be dependent, I have been raised and trained to be self-reliant. I have supported and cared for my family throughout my life and have been able to adapt to various environments and circumstances. To force such a person into a pet-like status would be both demoralizing and unfair.

Concerns About the Elderly Becoming Pets

As the respondent, I am deeply concerned about the future. The aging process can leave individuals more dependent on others, much like the animals we keep as pets. Disease, injury, mental deterioration, and feebleness can make individuals more vulnerable, and they may need 24/7 care. While I hope to avoid this fate, I am prepared for the possibility.

My Desire for Dignity in Dependency

Should the need arise, I would like to be the kind of pet who remains affectionate, cooperative, and somewhat entertaining. I would not complain or demand too much attention or service. My current dog, who is in his golden years, embodies this kind of character. He is reliable, cooperative, and still brings joy to my life.

The Importance of Respect in Job Interviews

Beyond the frustration and disappointment, the animal question raises broader concerns about the respect and professionalism afforded to job candidates. Companies that choose to ask such irrelevant questions might not be the best place to work, as they value superficiality over substance.

Conclusion

The "choose your animal" question is not only dumb but also disrespectful. It reflects a lack of understanding and professionalism. If a company asks such questions, it is likely that the job itself is questionable. As candidates, we have a responsibility to choose companies that value our skills, experience, and suitability for the role, rather than engaging in silly and irrelevant conversations.

Related Keywords

Job interviews, self-awareness, animal choices, job fit, elderly concerns