The Dual Mindset: Doublethink and Cognitive Dissonance in Human Belief

In George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984, the concept of 'doublethink' is introduced, encapsulating the ability to believe two contradictory concepts simultaneously. This phenomenon is also known in the contemporary lexicon as 'cognitive dissonance.'

Doublethink: A Form of Self-Preservation

Doublethink is a form of psychological defense mechanism, often used as a tool for self-preservation in the face of societal pressure. Individuals may adopt a secondary set of beliefs that are contradictory to their primary beliefs, but can argue that both beliefs are true, often by finding a justification that aligns them. For example, a Christian could believe in the Big Bang and evolution, justifying that it was God who caused the Big Bang to occur and was the driving force behind human evolution.

Compartmentalization and Conformity

The human brain is capable of rational thought, yet it is not always the default setting. Consider the human brain's remarkable ability to compartmentalize thoughts and adapt to conformity. For instance, people can hold different sets of beliefs simultaneously without feeling cognitive strain. This ability to believe in contradictory ideas does not necessarily mean both points are equally true. In reality, one truth exists for every matter, and personal belief does not alter the truth.

Cognitive Dissonance: A Necessary Evil?

Cognitive dissonance, the state of holding two or more contradictory beliefs, the possibility of action or ideas, can be seen as a natural human tendency rather than a flaw. The human mind's capacity to live in a 'Goldilocks zone'—where immediate satisfaction leads to a new goal—means that focusing on one belief too rigidly can be counterproductive. It often signifies fanaticism or psychological issues, such as schizophrenia.

The Relativity of Beliefs

The diversity of beliefs and the subjective nature of reality make it reasonable to question the exclusivity of one's own beliefs. Different people believe different things, which indicates that all beliefs are, in a sense, believable. Therefore, why couldn't one believe all of them? This flexibility in belief can open up a broader perspective and foster intellectual growth.

Conclusion

Doublethink and cognitive dissonance are innate human characteristics that reflect the complex and multifaceted nature of the human mind. While exact rational thought may not always be the default, the ability to embrace and reconcile contradictory ideas can lead to a richer and more nuanced understanding of the world. Ultimately, the coexistence of seemingly opposed beliefs can lead to a more harmonious and accepting society, where truth is valued more for its complexity than its simplicity.

References

Orwell, George. 1984. London: Secker Warburg, 1949.
Schooler, J.W., De sóc, E.S., produtos, S. Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a historic agenda. Psychological Inquiry, 23(1), 1-20.