The Double-Edged Sword: The Impact of Office Administration Courses on Academic Success and Survival
The Double-Edged Sword: The Impact of Office Administration Courses on Academic Success and Survival
As an ambitious student, I pursued formal education with unwavering optimism. However, my experiences at so-called prestigious institutions like Fordham University and Wright State University taught me otherwise. These institutions, cloaked under the guise of legitimate academic programs, exemplify the extreme manipulation and impact that poorly managed administrative structures can have on students. My story, although deeply personal, highlights the necessity of thorough research and caution when considering enrollment in such programs.
Scam Schools: The Initial Traps
My journey into academia was tainted almost immediately. Attending both Fordham University and Wright State University for graduate programs in psychology, I became a victim of academic fraud and manipulation. The underlying issues at both institutions were deeply rooted in leadership qualified inadequacies, Ponzi-like structures, and overall incompetence. Here are the primary reasons why these institutions are considered scammers:
1. Incompetent Leadership
The leadership at these institutions was primarily made up of individuals who lacked the necessary qualifications to effectively manage educational programs. This spelled poor execution of the programs, arbitrary and harmful requirements, and an overall subpar learning environment.
2. Ponzi-Scheme Structure
The administrative structure at these institutions was reminiscent of a Ponzi scheme. Requirements and rules were constantly changing for reasons that were difficult to substantiate, thereby creating a cycle of frustration and financial strain on students. Students were unaware of the ever-shifting needs, which led to a sense of constant insecurity and distrust.
3. Poor Course Quality and Grading
The coursework assigned was often useless, assigned by faculty who lacked the ability to explain concepts effectively. Additionally, grading was frequently capricious and unfair, leaving students questioning the validity of their education. Coursework such as online psychological articles discussion questions and simple Google Surveys were often assigned, raising question of the real learning value of the program.
Personal Experiences with Academic Extortion and Corruption
By the time I enrolled, I had already learned about the dangers of unregulated academic programs but was taken by surprise. My experiences at Fordham University and Wright State University were not isolated incidents. Academic fraud and corruption can occur in even the most reputable institutions. Here are some details on my experiences:
1. Academic Extortion at Wright State University
Enrollment was fraught with deliberate contrivances and intentional hurdles. My advisor, a man named Kevin Bennett, reduced what was supposed to be a supportive environment into a cruel and manipulative game. One particular encounter with Bennett illustrated his true colors. As I was about to leave the institute, Bennett asked his friend if the "game" was over, reflecting on my experience with the phrase, "Swirling around in a toilet bowl trying to avoid the splashback." This statement underscored the exhausting, demoralizing aspect of his manipulations.
2. Discrimination and Workplace Dynamics
Despite my diverse background, I faced blatant discrimination, racism, and sexism at Wright State University, a stark contrast to my previous experiences. For instance, faculty would dismiss my valid comments and competency, labeling my objections as "crazy." Professor Kevin Bennett, my advisor, and Gary Burns, a lecturer in PSY 703, were particularly noted for their unprofessionalism and unethical treatment of students. Bennett's use of literature allusions to marginalize me only added to the pervasive negativity I encountered throughout my time there.
3. ISTORIC IMPACT OF TERRIBLE LEADERSHIP
The leadership at both institutions was deeply flawed, leading to wasted time, financial loss, and frustration. For example, Valerie Shalin, a professor at Wright State, failed me for work I had supposedly completed, requiring me to take summer school where I was forced into a low-paid, menial job. This manipulation highlights the willingness of these institutions to exploit students for financial gain rather than providing a quality education.
Lessons Learned: The Importance of Scrutiny
My experiences underscore the importance of thorough research and due diligence before enrolling in any academic program. Institutions that fail to meet basic standards of ethical conduct, such as honest communication, fair treatment, and transparent requirements, should be avoided. By sharing my story, I hope to provide insight and caution to other potential students facing similar situations.
Conclusion
The manipulation and dishonesty I experienced at these institutions are not isolated incidents. Academic fraud and corruption can occur in any institution, and students must be vigilant in their research and due diligence. Do not support programs that engage in unethical practices, such as academic extortion, dishonesty, and manipulation. Seek out transparent, ethical institutions that prioritize the academic and professional development of their students.
Keywords: scam schools, academic fraud, administrative manipulation
-
The Best Strategies for Launching Your First Business Consulting Practice
The Best Strategies for Launching Your First Business Consulting Practice For ma
-
Persistence Without a Plan: Understanding the Limitations of Unwavering Determination
Introduction: The Myth of Unyielding Success Many believe that if you never give