The Controversy Surrounding Trumans Decision to Drop Atomic Bombs
The Controversy Surrounding Truman's Decision to Drop Atomic Bombs
Was the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan to end the Second World War a justifiable act of war, or was it a terrible mistake that claimed countless lives? Historians and contemporaries have debated this question for decades. In this article, we will explore the facts and context leading up to this decision to shed light on why President Truman made the choices he did.
Truman's Dilemma: The Bloody Path of Operation Downfall
By the spring and summer of 1945, the United States was facing a grim reality in the Pacific theater. The Battle of Okinawa, which ended in June 1945, had resulted in tens of thousands of casualties. This bloodshed was just a preview of what the planned invasion of Japan (Operation Downfall) was likely to bring.
The invasion of Japan was planned in two phases: Phase One, the invasion of Kyushu scheduled for November 1945 (Operation Olympic), and Phase Two, the invasion of Honshu in early 1946 (Operation Coronet).
According to the battle plan, the Allies would launch Phase One with approximately 90,000 to 120,000 troops. The projected Japanese resistance, however, was far more formidable. By early August 1945, U.S. intelligence was reporting a Japanese force of 13 divisions, giving the Japanese a significant advantage. This would have likely resulted in an estimated 5-10 million casualties, predominantly Japanese.
The Japanese Counterattack Plan: Ketsu-Go
While the Japanese military recognized its inability to defeat the Allies in military engagements, they devised a plan to turn every civilian into a combatant. Known as Ketsu-Go, this strategy involved training civilians, including women and children, to fight with improvised weapons. The ultimate goal was to make the invasion so costly that the U.S. would be forced to negotiate a settlement, potentially leading to the end of unconditional surrender.
This plan was chillingly detailed and would have resulted in horrific atrocities on both sides. The thought of what might have transpired had this plan been carried out is terrifying to consider. This strategy further underscores the dire circumstances in which President Truman found himself when he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs.
Truman's Decision: A Question of Compassion
Truman faced the ultimate dilemma: choose a route that would result in an estimated 5-10 million casualties, most of them Japanese, or deploy a weapon of unprecedented power to spare millions of lives.
Also, communism was rapidly gaining ground in the world, and the Soviets had just shown their strength in Europe. If the invasion of Japan went badly, the Soviets could potentially gain a foothold in East Asia, which was not a desirable outcome for the West.
Truman's decision may seem harsh, but from a humanitarian perspective, it prevented a much worse scenario. The atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been estimated to have killed at least 200,000 people. While this number is certainly tragic, it pales in comparison to what would have happened if the invasion had proceeded.
Legacy and Considerations
The legacy of the atomic bombings remains complex and multifaceted. Many argue that the decision to drop the bombs was a necessary evil, saving countless lives in both the East and West. On the other hand, these bombings have also been criticized for the destruction they caused and the long-term effects on the survivors, known as hibakusha.
It is crucial to remember the 500,000 Allied casualties that would have ensued from the invasion and the sacrifice of the approximately 280,000 Japanese soldiers who died in the war, as well as the countless civilian lives lost in the bombings. The bombings also gave Emperor Hirohito the leverage he needed to overcome the militarists in his Cabinet and surrender unconditionally. This decision ultimately led to the end of World War II and the establishment of a new global order.
Today, we pay tribute to the victims of the atomic bombings while also acknowledging the essential roles that strategic decisions, such as those made by President Truman, played in shaping the modern world.