The Candidate Experience at Amsterdam: A Closer Look at Glassdoor Reviews

When considering a job at Amsterdam, it's crucial to weigh the mixed reviews on Glassdoor. Some employees praise the company's innovative environment, diverse workforce, and competitive salaries. Others report challenges with work-life balance, management practices, and high-pressure workplaces. This article explores the candidate experience and highlights important factors to consider.

Work-Life Balance Challenges

Many employees report that the demands of their job at Amsterdam often lead to long hours, leaving little time for personal life. This can be particularly challenging for those who prioritize work-life balance. Glassdoor reviews frequently mention that some roles are particularly demanding, pushing employees to the brink of burnout.

Management Issues and Workplace Dynamics

Disappointing management practices, such as inconsistent management styles and a lack of upper management support, are also common complaints among employees. This lack of clear direction and support can make the work environment feel unsupportive and challenging.

High Pressure and Stress

Roles at Amsterdam are often described as high-tension environments, with employees feeling immense pressure to perform. This can have both positive and negative impacts. While it can drive success and innovation, it can also lead to high levels of stress and potential burnout.

The Candidate Experience at

My personal experience interviewing with Booking for a management position in 2022 was a frustrating and disappointing one. The candidate experience provided a powerful glimpse into the company culture and practices, and it highlights the importance of transparency and ethical hiring.

During the recruitment process, clear communication from the recruiter was notably absent. Despite initial assurances of a busy schedule, the lack of progress and transparency became increasingly frustrating. It took three interviews, a business case presentation, and a three-month wait before the recruiter finally informed me that an internal candidate had been chosen.

The emergence of an internal candidate is not a last-minute occurrence. Companies like Booking have established protocols to ensure internal candidates are considered first. The recruiter's behavior in this case was not only deceptive but also unethical, costing me valuable time and respect. The recruiter's failure to provide clear information and support raised significant questions about the hiring process.

When I inquired about the status of the recruitment process on LinkedIn, I was met with evasive answers. Moreover, the recruiter's claim that meeting the hiring manager would be unfair to other candidates is highly questionable. The eventual selection of an internal candidate does not justify this argument. Additionally, I was given misleading information about my candidacy status, leading to further frustration.

Conclusion

The candidate experience at Amsterdam should not be overlooked. While the company offers a competitive environment and potential for growth, the review of Glassdoor reveals significant challenges. It's essential to consider factors such as work-life balance, management practices, and the ethical conduct of the hiring process. Before accepting a position, it's wise to gather insights from current and former employees, and to ensure that the promises of a supportive and ethical company align with your professional values.