CareerCruise

Location:HOME > Workplace > content

Workplace

Teddy Roosevelt and Todays USA: Would He Be Disappointed with Corporate Dominance?

January 30, 2025Workplace4564
Would Teddy Roosevelt Be Disappointed in Todays USA? If one were to ti

Would Teddy Roosevelt Be Disappointed in Today's USA?

If one were to time-travel back to the early 20th century and put Teddy Roosevelt in the current political landscape of the United States, the former president would likely have some significant concerns. He might even express frustration, much like his famous quotation: 'How come a god-damn ass-hole can be president now.' This article explores how Teddy Roosevelt might react to the current state of the nation, focusing on corporate dominance and other issues.

Appalled by Corporate Control

One of the most striking contrasts that Teddy Roosevelt would likely notice is the current dominance of large corporations. It is highly probable that he would view the situation with great concern and disappointment, especially if he witnessed the formation of monopolies. This echoes his own historical fight against trusts and big business. Moreover, he might find the current political environment even more concerning, where corporations have a significant say in governance and policymaking.

The Bull Moose Party Revived?

If some history is any indication, Teddy Roosevelt would probably revive the Bull Moose Party. This reflexive action would come from his disdain for President Donald Trump, whom he would likely consider a swine or "shit" unfit for office. Given his history of political activism and his strong stance on ethical governance, Roosevelt would likely see Trump's presidency as a betrayal of the values that he held dear.

Moreover, Roosevelt would likely take matters into his own hands. His manner of direct action and his belief in personal responsibility to save the country would push him to take charge once again. He would see it as his duty to ensure that the nation remains on the right path, especially in the face of what he would perceive as considerable threats, both internal and external. This also points to his belief in his own authority and ability to lead, much like his actions during his "New Nationalism" era.

Struggles with Enemies and Gerrymandering

Another issue that would likely disconcert Roosevelt is the presence of 'enemies' within the country. He would view the challenges as those who challenge the integrity and unity of the nation. In his time, this might have been portrayed in terms of social and political divides. In the present, this could include threats from opposition parties, disaffected citizens, and possibly even foreign influences.

He would also express strong disapproval of Gerrymandering, a practice he would likely view as undemocratic and corrupt. His belief in fair and just governance would demand changes to ensure that each vote truly counts and that the will of the people is reflected in the political process.

International Relations: A Strong Armed Approach

The international relations landscape would also likely provoke strong reactions from Teddy Roosevelt. His history of dealing with strong-arm tactics and diplomacy (as seen in his dealings with Panama and his stance against the Russian Revolution) would make it clear that he would have a more assertive approach to foreign relations.

With the current leadership and the changing geopolitical climate under Presidents Putin and Xi, he would likely find it challenging to establish mutual respect. His strong leadership style might clash with these leaders, leading to potential political confrontations. However, he would also see these changes through a lens of detail and historical context, appreciating the evolution of nations.

Moreover, he might be surprised to notice that Germany has become a more amicable partner. This could indicate his ability to appreciate the progress and changes in major power dynamics.

Concluding Thoughts

Whether one agrees with Teddy Roosevelt's methods or not, it is clear that his perception of the United States today would be one of significant concern. Corporate dominance, political division, and possible external threats would be key issues that he would find disconcerting. His response would likely mirror his historical actions: he would take charge, work towards reform, and ensure the nation remains strong and unified.