CareerCruise

Location:HOME > Workplace > content

Workplace

Share Ownership for a Fired CEO of a Founded Company

February 19, 2025Workplace3613
Share Ownership for a Fired CEO of a Founded Company The question of s

Share Ownership for a Fired CEO of a Founded Company

The question of share ownership for a CEO who has been fired from a company they founded is often misunderstood. While many assume that losing the CEO position automatically means a loss of ownership, the situation can be more nuanced. Here we explore the factors that determine whether a fired CEO retains their share of the company.

Ownership and Vesting

First and foremost, it's important to distinguish between the equity an individual receives as part of their fair compensation and their vested shares. When a CEO is fired, they typically retain any equity or stocks they have already received. This includes any options that are still active—they can exercise these options as long as they are still valid. Similarly, any equity shares that have vested are theirs to keep.

However, the picture is less clear with unvested equity and options. In many cases, these may be voided if the CEO is fired for any reason unless their employment contract specifically states otherwise. It's crucial to review the terms of the employment contract to understand the implications of different termination scenarios.

Implications of Being Removed from the Board

Being removed from the board does not necessarily result in the loss of ownership. Many founders remain shareholders even after they are no longer board members. Bill Gates, for example, is still a major shareholder of Microsoft Corporation despite not being part of the board. This is because being a shareholder is a separate role from board membership.

Companies often have specific provisions in their shareholder agreements addressing these scenarios. A standard clause in such agreements might require the company to buy back the founder's shares at a predetermined price, particularly if the departure is due to inappropriate behavior.

Handling Rogue Shareholders

Having a rogue or problematic shareholder can be detrimental to a company. In such cases, the company might consider converting the shares to non-voting status. This would prevent the individual from influencing company decisions through the shares they hold.

For instance, if a founder is divorced and their ex-spouse seeks to use the shares to cause trouble, the company might opt to buy out the shares or convert them into non-voting status if they cannot afford outright purchase.

Understanding the Relationship Between Employment and Share Ownership

Finally, it's essential to differentiate between share ownership and employment status. A fired CEO retains their shares unless the employment contract explicitly states that the ownership of shares is tied to continued employment. This means that even if a CEO is fired, their share ownership remains intact, provided they did not agree to such conditional ownership.

In conclusion, while the termination of a CEO's employment can impact their position within the company, it does not automatically result in a loss of share ownership. Understanding the terms of the employment contract and the specific provisions of the company's shareholder agreement are crucial in navigating these situations.