Introduction

The question of whether Scotland needs permission from the UK to hold a second independence referendum has been a contentious issue for many years. This article aims to address common misconceptions and advocate for the democratic rights of Scotland.

Historical Context and Misunderstandings

For centuries, some have erroneously believed that Scotland must seek permission from the UK to hold such a referendum. This notion has been perpetuated by certain political figures, often referred to as Wastemonster and Holeyrude, who have misled both Scottish and UK citizens.

Contrary to popular belief, the term United Kingdoms (plural) is used correctly to refer to the various nations that make up the UK. The singular Kingdom is a misnomer and a term manipulated to obscure the true relationship between Scotland and the rest of the UK.

The Legal Framework and Democracy

The European Union (EU) did not demand authorization from the UK before a referendum on Brexit. This lack of demand does not set a precedent for Scotland. The 2014 independence referendum, conducted with the agreement of the UK government, could not be replicated without their consent.

When entering into any formal agreement or contract, both parties must agree to any changes. Scotland agreed not to hold another referendum for a specific period, such as 'once in a lifetime' or 'every generation.' This agreement was made with the UK government, and thus, changes would require their consent.

The Nature of the UK-Scotland Relationship

The concept of a "union" between the UK is often compared to a marriage, where one party wants to end it while the other seeks to prolong it for various reasons. Such a comparison overlooks the fundamental democratic right of Scotland to self-determination.

A dysfunctional and often abusive relationship does not justify denying one's right to seek autonomy. In the case of the UK-Scotland relationship, Scotland must have the right to choose its own future without interference from the UK government.

The Supreme Court Involvement

While the Scottish government initiated legal action to force a second independence referendum, the Supreme Court decision reaffirmed the need for UK government approval. This ruling was acknowledged to preserve the essential principle of democracy, as the result of a referendum cannot be ignored or silenced by any single entity.

As Sturgeon aptly put it, 'Dont fluck with democracy.' The Scottish people have the right to determine their own future, and any attempt to restrict this right is a violation of democratic principles.

Conclusion

The right of Scotland to independence is a matter of fundamental democratic principle. It is important to dispel misconceptions and advocate for the full democratic rights of the Scottish people. Whether Scotland chooses to seek another independence referendum or not, it should be a permissible and independent decision, not one subject to the whims of the UK government.