Reflections on the Gavin Newsom Recall Election: Voting Reform and the Future of California

The recent Gavin Newsom recall election in California brought to the forefront several critical issues surrounding the electoral process. One of the primary concerns is the need to shift back to in-person voting with proper identity checks.

Voting Process and Its Challenges

Many argue that the primary issue with the recall election was the ease with which it could be triggered. As Newsom himself pointed out, a reinstatement into the governorship would be possible even if the recall effort only secured a plurality of the votes, not a majority. This situation is problematic as it involves multiple candidates with lower percentages collectively surpassing the leading gubernatorial candidate.
It raises questions about the integrity of the election process and the importance of stricter voter identification checks. In-person voting with ID verification might help prevent such outcomes, ensuring that the person responsible for replacing the governor is someone who has garnered significant support from the electorate.

Proposed Reforms: A Role for the Lieutenant Governor

One potential solution to the issues highlighted by the recall election is to institute a provision where the Lieutenant Governor automatically steps into the governor's role upon a recall. This could significantly reduce the likelihood of a forced special election and ensure continuity in governance.

Under such a system, the Lieutenant Governor would serve as an interim leader, providing both stability and experienced leadership until a new election is held.

The Aftermath and Public Opinion

Despite the failed recall efforts, many voters in California cast their ballots to replace Gavin Newsom. The outcome was somewhat ironic as every county in California chose Elder as the replacement, with the exception of one. This fascinating outcome highlights the complexity of public opinion and the diverse views within the state.

Controversial Incidents and Race Relations

Another contentious element of the recall election was the prevalence of racist incidents. A notable example was an image of a liberal white woman wearing a gorilla mask and throwing eggs at a Black candidate for governor. Such behavior cannot be tolerated in any society, and it underscores the need for greater awareness and tolerance.

The Future and Credibility of Leadership

Personal qualities and competencies of leaders remain crucial in shaping public opinion and future policies. Those who lead with knowledge and a vision for the future tend to gain the support of residents and the state as a whole. Conversely, leaders who behave in ways that alienate or intimidate segments of the population are likely to face challenges.

For instance, leaders who act in a manner that appears biased or discriminatory can result in significant backlash from the public. Newsom has been criticized for his environmental policies, such as the 'zeliye class' issue, which, known for their stringent environmental regulations, have been met with resistance from some.

On the other hand, those who are approachable, knowledgeable, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to the well-being of the state and its residents are more likely to garner support and maintain credibility.

Ultimately, the future of California depends on how these issues are addressed and the reforms that are implemented to ensure fair, transparent, and respectful elections.