Reflecting on Jason Garrett as Dallas Cowboys Head Coach: An SEO Perspective

As SEO experts, we often consider the impact of a coach's tenure on a team's success. Would you call for Jason Garrett's replacement, or do his existing strengths and the team's stability outweigh the concerns about his play-calling and team management?

Overview of the Dallas Cowboys Coaching Situation

Jason Garrett has been at the helm of the Dallas Cowboys for a considerable time, handling press conferences while standing by the sidelines with an aura of positivity but sometimes appearing unemotional. Despite his cool demeanor, his previous hires and decisions have brought significant changes to the team, particularly in the offensive coordinate role. The recent departure of Scott Linehan indicates a shift in strategy and a need to improve offensive performance.

The Issue with Scott Linehan's Succession

Scott Linehan, the former offensive coordinator, struggled with play-calling and failed to keep Dak Prescott in a dominant position. This misstep led to the Cowboys making the right decision to part ways with Linehan. However, Jason Garrett's decision-making process reveals a significant aspect of his leadership. Does he stick with familiar faces or make bold changes?

Why Jason Garrett Remains Key

Jason Garrett's core strengths include the respect of the team, control of the locker room, and a non-disruptive relationship with Jerry and Stephen Jones. While he may lack the exuberance of some coaches, his ability to work with strong personalities and maintain the team's stability is invaluable.

Garrett's tenure is marked by a lack of drama and a focus on the field. He maintains a balance that avoids the chaos seen in previous head coaches and maintains the trust of the team. The front office under Will McClay has also contributed to the team's success, ensuring consistent player development and improvement through strategic drafts.

Potential Areas for Improvement

Despite his strengths, Jason Garrett needs to address the conservative approach to play-calling. Aggressive coaches in other NFL teams, such as those in Los Angeles and Philadelphia, frequently go for it on 4th down and mix up their tactics to challenge the opposition. Garrett could benefit from a similar approach to keep his players engaged and to exploit opponents effectively.

Moreover, there is a need for Garrett to hire competent assistant coaches who can develop the defensive and offensive players to their fullest potential. While he excels in his role as a CEO-type coach, his assistants must push the envelope to elevate the team's performance.

Conclusion: Stay the Course or Change?

While Garrett may not excite fans with his energetic demeanor or innovative play-calling, his team's success in recent seasons suggests that he is doing more right than wrong. The Cowboys' playoff run and the game victory indicate that Stark Raving Nuts is improving, albeit slowly. The decision to fire Garrett should not be based solely on short-term results but on long-term strategy and the team's stability.

Next year, as the 2019 season unfolds, the Cowboys will have to evaluate their offensive performance and strategy. If the offense fails to improve, and the team cannot secure a playoff spot again, then a change may be necessary. However, for now, maintaining the current leadership seems to be the most prudent course of action.