Pros and Cons of Office Life vs Field Life at Schlumberger: An Insider's Perspective

When considering a career at Schlumberger, one of the key decisions to make is whether to pursue office life or field life. Each has its own set of pros and cons, making it important for employees to understand the differences before making a choice. In this article, we will explore the advantages and disadvantages of both office and field life at Schlumberger, based on industry insights and employee experiences.

Pros of Office Life at Schlumberger

Working in an office environment at Schlumberger offers a variety of benefits that can be quite appealing. One of the most significant advantages is the better work-life balance. Office-based employees often have more predictable schedules, making it easier to manage personal and professional commitments. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals with families or other personal obligations.

The stability of location is another advantage of office life. Office workers typically have a set base where they can remain for extended periods, which can provide a sense of security and familiarity. This is especially useful for those who value a stable routine in their personal lives.

Flexibility in planning vacations is another perk of office life. The ability to take time off without the constraints of being on a field placement can be highly advantageous for those who prioritize travel, family bonding, or simply relaxation.

Maintaining a higher connectivity with family and friends is also a significant benefit of office work. Offshore locations for field workers are often in far-flung areas, which can lead to extensive periods away from loved ones. Conversely, office workers can maintain regular contact with their social networks, ensuring they stay connected.

Cons of Office Life at Schlumberger

While office life at Schlumberger offers a range of advantages, there are also some notable downsides. One of the primary concerns is the lesser pay. Office-based positions tend to offer lower salaries compared to field positions. This can be a significant consideration for employees who prioritize financial stability.

The absence of big fat bonuses is another drawback. Even though these bonuses may have been more prevalent in the past, the current industry trends suggest that bonuses are not as generous as they once were. This can impact the overall compensation package and may not align with the financial goals of some workers.

Another challenge is the low mobility. If you have a strong desire to relocate frequently, working in an office may not be the best fit. The core operations of Schlumberger often involve field work, which can provide more opportunities for relocation and new experiences. For employees who enjoy the variety and excitement of different locations, this can be a drawback of office life.

Slower career progression is yet another potential con of office life. Office-based employees may find that their career growth is not as rapid as those in field positions. This can be due to a lack of direct involvement in core operations, which can limit visibility and opportunity for advancement.

Pros of Field Life at Schlumberger

For those who thrive in dynamic and diverse environments, field life at Schlumberger offers a unique set of advantages. Diverse work experiences are a notable benefit, as field positions involve a wide range of tasks and locations. This can be an excellent opportunity for personal and professional development.

While the pay and bonuses tend to be higher in field positions, the income can be significantly affected by location and project needs. This can provide a strong financial incentive for those who are focused on earning higher salaries.

Flexibility and the ability to travel are also significant advantages of field life. Employees working in field positions can experience a variety of locations and cultures, which can be both exciting and enriching. This can be particularly appealing for those who enjoy travel and new experiences.

Cons of Field Life at Schlumberger

However, field life is not without its challenges. The inconvenience and challenges of being away from home can be significant. Living and working in remote or isolated areas can be demanding and may require a different mindset. Additionally, the unpredictability of field work can be unsettling for some employees, as it often involves long travel periods and irregular working hours.

Field life can also be associated with a faster pace of work. While this can be motivating for some, it can also be overwhelming for others. The fast tempo and the need to adapt quickly to various conditions can be a strain.

Health and safety concerns are another consideration for field workers. Working in remote locations can increase the risk of accidents and health issues, which can affect both the physical and mental well-being of employees.

Conclusion

Choosing between office life and field life at Schlumberger requires careful consideration of personal priorities and career goals. Office-based positions offer a more stable and predictable work environment with better connectivity and a better work-life balance, but may come with financial compromises. Field positions, on the other hand, provide excellent financial opportunities, diverse work experiences, and the freedom to travel but can be demanding and challenging in terms of location and work pace.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on a thorough evaluation of individual preferences and career aspirations. By understanding the pros and cons of both office and field life, employees can make informed choices that align with their long-term goals.