Political Rationalization: Why the Right Doesn't Ask Why Democrats Didn't Steal the 2024 Election

From the unfortunate Orwellian exercise in doublethink known as the Republican viewpoint on the 2020 election results to the ongoing election 2024 narrative, the reframing of outcomes should be noted. Why does the responsibility for proof suddenly flip from one election to the next? This article delves into the rationalizations and continued denials from the right, exploring how these distortions serve political ends.

Election Affairs of 2020 and 2024

The Republican narrative from 2020, centered around the claim of a stolen election, exhibits a remarkable degree of doublethink. When it comes to the 2024 election, the same party has strategically refrained from questioning why Democrats did not similarly "steal" the election. Why this shift, and what are the underlying motivations?

MAGA Logic and Its Echelons

For the MAGA movement, the results of a presidential election are either a forgone conclusion or the product of miraculous election integrity, depending on the outcome. The assertion that any election Trump loses is due to fraud, while any win is attributed to a heroic defense against that same fraud, is a prime example of this mindset. This pattern of reasoning has been consistently applied, making the 2024 election yet another instance of this binary thinking.

Conspiracy and Theorizing

A significant portion of the 2024 election discussions involves election conspiracy theories. These theories hold that the election was deliberately manipulated, despite the lack of substantial evidence. When pushing these theories, GOP supporters often resort to denials and conspiracy rhetoric. The tension within this narrative is evident in statements like: "If Democrats hadn't cheated, Kamala would have won only California and New York, and she actually sucked so much that she only got fraudulent votes."

Passwords to Silence

The 2024 election saw a strategic shift in post-election behavior from deniers and influencers. After about 3 AM on election night, these groups went "radio silent," much like a murderer pleading the Fifth Amendment on the witness stand. Their silence is a transparent way to manipulate public opinion. The goal never was to address any legitimate problems but rather to serve a political agenda, ultimately to cement Trump's image of a martyr and a champion.

Unfortunate Logical Conundrums

The intricacies of some GOP assertions continue to baffle and frustrate critical observers. Why would anyone believe that Trump managed to both lose an election and secure abortion-related amendments with the same group of voters? It is as logically flawed as it is preposterous.

The current political landscape is marked by a peculiar declaration that Republicans are collectively stating, 'We didn’t steal it last time either.' Given that Trump just lost the 2024 election, and given that the narrative is relying on the perspective that Democrats stole the election, it's a challenging stance to maintain logically consistent.

Final Thoughts

The political rationalizations of the right often serve to perpetuate a grand narrative aimed at advancing a movement rather than seeking objective truths or rectifying real issues. As seen in the election 2024 context, the shift in logic and the strategic silencing of voices are not accidental but carefully planned to align with a broader political agenda. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the ongoing narrative battles in United States politics.

Remember, the debate is not just about who won the election, but about the integrity of the democratic process itself.