Necessity of Control for Social Peace in an Imperfect World

In an imperfect world, the concept of peace is often elusive. This essay delves into the role of control in maintaining social harmony, drawing from historical and contemporary examples. It also explores the influence of religious principles on societal peace, especially in light of recent political events and societal upheavals.

It is widely recognized that peace does not exist uniformly, especially in major cities, which are often governed by single-party political structures. The introduction of figures such as Donald Trump in 2015 marked a significant shift, leading to a reevaluation of values and societal norms. The aftermath of the 2020 election and subsequent governance have further highlighted the importance of control and the mechanisms that ensure social stability.

Control and Social Stability: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives

The idea that societies devoid of control can maintain peace has been challenged by historical events. Following Barack Obama's presidency and the subsequent election of Donald Trump, there was a noticeable shift in the political and social landscape. Concepts such as 'post-racial' and 'post-feminist' societies were revisited, illustrating the fragility of ideals under the absence of stringent governance and norms.

The role of media and propaganda in shaping public opinion cannot be understated. The 'Treason press' played a significant part in undermining the Trump administration, emphasizing the importance of control in both political and social spheres. Without strict control, societies might fall into chaos, as evidenced by the lack of 'safe spaces' during the 2020 election, which were prevalent during prior elections.

Control Through Governance: A Necessary Evil?

The need for control is not a luxury but a necessity, especially given the imperfections of human nature. Despite the existence of laws and societal norms, individuals often struggle to determine what is 'enough.' Laws serve as a middle ground, defining acceptable behavior and rights. Excessive control leads to oppression, while complete freedom leads to anarchy.

One stark example of control in governance is the recent actions of Gavin Newsom. His single-minded focus on electric vehicles (EVs) showcases the dangers of overreach. Banning common household appliances and forcing EV owners to charge their vehicles only when 'necessary' demonstrates a lack of foresight and fairness. This approach not only exacerbates existing challenges but also undermines public trust.

Religious Influences on Social Peace

For many, the Bible and the teachings of Jesus Christ provide a framework for understanding and achieving peace. Religion often plays a crucial role in shaping societal values and norms. The belief that God is at the helm ensures a sense of order and a shared moral compass, which are essential for maintaining social peace.

In contrast, totalitarian regimes that operate on the principle of control might offer a veneer of peace. Countries like Russia, Iran, and North Korea are often cited as examples of this. However, such systems are inherently unstable and oppressive, leading to social unrest and a lack of genuine freedom.

Conclusion: Balancing Control and Freedom

In conclusion, the necessity of control in achieving social peace is evident, particularly in an imperfect world. While excessive control can lead to oppression, a complete lack of governance leads to chaos. The ideal balance lies in a system that respects human imperfections and fosters a stable, equitable, and harmonious society.

Whether through religious principles or pragmatic governance, the pursuit of peace requires careful consideration and a willingness to adapt. As we continue to navigate the complexities of the modern world, the importance of finding this balance remains a constant reminder of the human need for order in a chaotic world.