Is the Phrase 'Leave of Absence' Redundant?

The phrase 'leave of absence' is often scrutinized for its apparent redundancy. But to truly understand whether it is redundant, one must explore the nuanced meanings and contexts in which these terms are used.

Understanding 'Leave' and 'Absence'

The term 'leave' refers to permission to be absent from a duty or responsibility. On the other hand, 'absence' simply indicates the state of being away or not present. When these two terms are combined, the phrase 'leave of absence' seems redundant because 'absence' is already implied by the term 'leave.'

Informal Contexts vs. Formal Settings

In informal contexts, people might simply say 'a leave' or 'time off,' believing the phrase to be redundant. However, in a broader organizational context, 'leave of absence' serves a specific purpose. It is often used as a stock phrase that refers to a leave for a particular, unspecified reason. In some organizations, this phrase has evolved to label a specific type of leave when the reason for the absence is inappropriate to name directly.

Euphemistic Use and Redundancy

In some cases, the apparent redundancy in 'leave of absence' is a form of euphemism. This usage allows organizations to maintain a certain level of formality and discretion without explicitly naming the reason for the leave. By using the phrase 'leave of absence,' the exact reason is obfuscated, making it more acceptable to use when the reasons for an absence are not suitable for public discussion. This is particularly common in professional settings where the reasons for an individual's absence may be sensitive or confidential.

The Etymology and Usage of 'Leave of Absence'

Upon closer examination, the phrase 'leave of absence' is not redundant when understood in its proper context. The term 'leave' in 'leave of absence' carries the meaning of 'permission.' This permission authorizes a period of absence. When used on its own, 'to go on leave' is actually a shortening of 'to go on leave of absence.'

Comparison with Other Phrases: 'Please' and 'AWOL'

Another example to illustrate this point is the phrase 'please.' In the phrase 'if you please,' 'please' adds politeness but is not redundant. Similarly, in the context of 'leave of absence,' 'leave' simply means 'permission.'

AWOL: A Contrast

Conversely, the phrase 'AWOL' (Absent Without Leave) uses 'absence' to signify 'departure without authorization.' This highlights the distinction between 'absence' in the context of 'leave of absence' and 'AWOL.' In 'leave of absence,' absence is understood to be authorized, whereas in 'AWOL,' it is unauthorized.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the phrase 'leave of absence' might seem redundant at first glance, it serves a specific purpose in certain contexts. It ensures clarity and discretion, and its meaning is integral to its usage. When used correctly, it communicates the idea of authorized absence without being superfluous.