Differences Between Robert’s Rules of Order and the AIP Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure

Both Robert’s Rules of Order and the AIP Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure are designed to facilitate the orderly conduct of meetings and decision-making in groups. However, they have distinct differences in their approaches, structure, and usage. This article will explore these differences in detail to help you choose the right system for your organization's needs.

Robert's Rules of Order

Origin: Developed by Henry Martyn Robert in 1876, Robert’s Rules of Order remains one of the most widely used parliamentary authorities in the United States and beyond. It has stood the test of time and continues to evolve, with the latest edition being the 12th edition published in 2020.

Complexity: The rules are comprehensive and detailed, covering a wide range of procedures and scenarios. This includes specific rules for various types of motions, voting procedures, and meeting protocols. Due to its extensive nature, it may be seen as complex and formal.

Structure: The rules are organized into a hierarchical structure, with different types of motions such as main motions, subsidiary motions, and privileged motions. Each type of motion has its own precedence and method of addressing it, providing a clear and systematic approach.

Usage: This system is commonly used by larger organizations, including governmental bodies, non-profits, and corporate boards. Its detailed nature often makes it suitable for formal and complex environments.

Amendments: The rules are periodically amended to reflect contemporary practices and needs. The latest edition, the 12th, reflects the most recent updates and improvements.

AIP Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure

Origin: Developed by the American Institute of Parliamentarians (AIP) and first published in 1951, the AIP Standard Code offers a more streamlined alternative to Robert's Rules. It emphasizes flexibility and practicality, making it more accessible for users.

Complexity: Generally considered simpler and more accessible than Robert’s Rules, the AIP Code is designed to be user-friendly, particularly for smaller organizations and informal groups. Its streamlined nature makes it easier to adopt and use without extensive formalities.

Structure: The AIP code emphasizes flexibility and practicality. It provides clear guidelines that allow for a smooth meeting flow, adapting to the specific needs of the organization without rigid procedures. This makes it easy for groups to tailor the rules to their specific circumstances.

Usage: This code is typically favored by smaller organizations such as clubs and associations. Since it provides more flexibility and less rigid procedures, it is better suited for less formal settings where groups may not require the extensive rules outlined in Robert's Rules.

Amendments: Like Robert’s Rules, the AIP Code has been updated over time. The latest edition was published in 2012, ensuring that it remains relevant and effective.

Key Differences

Complexity and Formality: Robert’s Rules is more detailed and formal, while the AIP Standard Code is designed to be simpler and more adaptable. Target Audience: Robert’s Rules is often suited for larger, more formal organizations, while the AIP Standard Code is better for smaller or less formal groups. Procedural Flexibility: The AIP code allows for more flexibility in procedures, making it easier for organizations to adapt the rules to their specific needs.

In Summary

The choice between Robert’s Rules of Order and the AIP Standard Code often depends on the size and formality of the organization, as well as the specific needs and preferences of its members. A careful assessment of your group's requirements will help determine which system will work best for your organization.

By understanding the differences between these two systems, you can make an informed decision that will ensure your meetings are conducted efficiently and effectively.