Introduction

Since the emergence of the novel coronavirus in 2019, a controversial debate has raged regarding the role economics, specifically capitalism, has played in the social and economic upheavals that followed. This article delves into the relationship between coronavirus and capitalism, exploring how the virus has been used to centralize capital and legitimize systemic economic shifts.

Economic Collapse and the Role of Capitalism

The article posits that capitalism has 'collapsed' in the face of the coronavirus pandemic. The virus is seen as a catalyst and perhaps even a solution to the longstanding issues within capitalist economies, particularly regarding economic recovery and restructuring. The pandemic is viewed not as a natural occurrence, but rather as a deliberate mechanism to centralize capital and effect massive, albeit contentious, 'creative destruction.'

According to this perspective, the sudden focus on public health measures has provided an opportunity for the centralization of economic resources. The author argues that this centralization would not have been possible otherwise, pointing to the belief that 'the virus is basically nonsense,' and suggesting that only 'morons' would attempt to divide people along issues such as masks and vaccinations. These divisions, the thinking goes, allow for a smoother transition to a more centralized form of economic organization.

The Impact of the Pandemic on Economic Growth and Profitability

The pandemic has undeniably led to a significant global recession. While the virus is cited as a major contributor, the article argues that the economic downturn had already been in motion prior to the virus's emergence. The author suggests that the collapse of the capitalist system is more a result of systemic issues than the virus itself. This viewpoint challenges the prevailing narrative that the virus is solely to blame for the economic downturn, asserting instead that the conditions for economic collapse were already present.

The shutdowns enacted to combat the spread of the virus are also seen as a step towards economic centralization. The author posits that these measures have only reinforced existing economic trends, making the argument that 'the virus will continuously be used for the duration of the collapse of capitalism."

Coronavirus and Health Policy

The article also rails against the role of government institutions and regulations in exacerbating the situation during the pandemic. It argues that government measures, aimed at regulating healthcare industries, have inadvertently inhibited the industry's ability to effectively combat the virus. Moreover, the author points to the U.S. government's reliance on private industry to address the medical supply demands, despite previous inefficiencies in regulating healthcare products.

A significant portion of the article focuses on the vaccination program, which is described as a potential 'yearly boom industry,' driven by the viral mutation and the constant need for new vaccines. This section underscores how the virus has created a sustenance for economic activities that were previously under threat under the capitalist system.

The Fault Lies with Capitalism

In conclusion, the argument is made that capitalism should be held responsible for the collapse of the economic system as well as the immediate effects of the pandemic. This responsibility lies in the use of the virus to centralize capital and further a neoliberal agenda, resulting in the destruction of small businesses and increased profits for a select few. The author suggests that the traditional understanding of capitalism, rooted in Marxist theory, is inadequate to explain the modern capitalist system, and that coronavirus serves as a new form of capitalism.

Thus, understanding the interplay between coronavirus and capitalism offers a lens through which to scrutinize the current economic collapse, identifying the systemic failures and the chosen solutions presented by a capitalist narrative amplified by the virus.