Board Position Recruitment: A Cautionary Tale from Boardsi

Is finding a board position really as straightforward as responding to an ad?

Challenge the notion that obtaining a board position is a simple process by delving into the pitfalls of Boardsi, a company that has garnered significant criticism for its questionable practices in soliciting board member applications.

The Alarming Story of Boardsi

My journey into the world of board recruitment began with a response to an ad from Boardsi in the UK, promising the legitimacy of their board member recruitment process. However, my initial suspicion was rapidly confirmed when I questioned specific aspects of their ad, particularly their mismatch between US and UK qualifications.

Upon further inquiry, I raised several pertinent questions regarding the suitability of the ad given the UK context, but received no substantive responses. Instead, the ad's creators promised to get back to me and failed to follow through. This experience resulted in a conclusion that their recruitment process was merely a ruse to attract users into subscribing.

Paying for a False Promise

The real damage arises when individuals opt to pay for the questionable services offered by Boardsi. A myriad of reviewers on platforms like Trust Pilot, LinkedIn, and Reddit share similar experiences of paying the required fees—initially a $200 upfront cost, followed by monthly payments of around $100—and emerging disappointed with the services received.

Further evidence of Boardsi's dubious practices can be found in their Better Business Bureau (BBB) rating in California, where the firm boasts a collection of numerous complaints. This rating should serve as a stark warning to potential board members considering engaging with Boardsi or similar firms that operate on an advanced payment scheme.

Why You Should Beware

A pervasive theme in the reviews and complaints is the unwise nature of paying for board position recruitment services. Potential board members are encouraged to exercise extreme caution, as the financial and reputational risks associated with such services far outweigh the potential benefits.

The advice from industry experts is clear: avoid companies that require upfront payments and promise quick placements without providing detailed verification or references.

Conclusion

The cautionary tale of Boardsi serves as a reminder that in today's competitive job market, unconventional recruitment methods come with significant downsides. The search for a board position should be approached with due diligence, using reputable channels and building a strong, verifiable track record. By doing so, aspiring board members can avoid the pitfalls of ineffective and potentially fraudulent practices.

Remember, the path to a board position is often more nuanced and requires a strategic approach that includes building a comprehensive professional network and fostering relationships rather than relying on quick fixes.