Is the Black Lives Matter Organization Wise to Promote Christmas?

Black Lives Matter (BLM) is an organization that has been at the forefront of advocating for racial justice and equality. However, there is a debate surrounding the wisdom of their decision to focus on promoting Christmas rather than addressing more pressing issues. Regardless of their objectives, the success of their campaigns and the public perception of BLM are crucial.

Objective Setting and Success

The success of any organization, particularly BLM, is determined by the objectives they set for themselves. Critics argue that BLM's objectives can be unreasonable and unrealistic, which may lead to irrelevance. Additionally, by focusing on promoting Christmas, BLM might be seen as alienating those who do not share their values or agendas, which could harm their public image.

Marketing Strategy and Public Perception

BLM's decision to promote Christmas could, in fact, be a strategic move. By associating with a widely recognized and beloved holiday, the organization can attract more attention and potential supporters. Christmas is a time when people are more inclined to be kind and compassionate, which aligns with BLM’s mission of promoting social justice. Furthermore, through social media and other platforms, BLM can use Christmas as a vehicle to spread their message and mobilize supporters.

Media Coverage and Perception Management

The media's role in shaping public perception of organizations like BLM is significant. The information provided or withheld by the media can greatly influence how the general public perceives the organization. In the case of BLM, the media's tendency to focus on negative aspects, such as confrontations and protests, rather than the organization's positive actions can create a skewed public image. By promoting a positive message like Christmas, BLM can achieve a more favorable media coverage and public perception.

The Controversial 1/6 Insurrection

Another aspect of the debate around BLM's strategy is the 1/6 insurrection. The organization claims to have nothing to do with this event, citing a lack of evidence. However, evidence suggests that Antifa and BLM members were involved in the insurrection. Even those who have been arrested and released continue to use their positions to disrupt and engage in violent activities.

Case Study: John Sullivan / JadenX

One specific example is John Sullivan, also known as JadenX. He was on parole for firebombings and had a permanent restraining order from federal properties. Additionally, Sullivan actively called for insurgent actions on Antifa Strike International, INSURGENCE USA, and BLM. He was seen breaking a window of Ashley Babbit and was involved in promoting violent incidents through mainstream media outlets. Despite his criminal history and involvement in violent activities, Sullivan has not been held accountable properly.

Conclusion: Exposure vs. Violence

In conclusion, promoting Christmas could be seen as a wiser move for BLM than engaging in further violent protests. By focusing on positive and community-building activities, BLM can potentially change public perception and achieve its goals more effectively. In contrast, their history of violence and irresponsibility makes them appear more as a threat than a force for change. Exposing themselves through their actions rather than through ongoing violence can lead to a more favorable outcome for their cause.