Are Interviews Designed to Benefit the Interviewer More Than the Interviewee?

The question of who benefits more from an interview—whether it's the interviewer or the interviewee—has always piqued the interest of both parties involved. It's a topic that delves into the very essence of the interview process and its inherent purpose.

The Purpose of Interviews

Interviews serve multifaceted purposes beyond mere entertainment. They are tools for revealing insights, gauging credibility, and testing the candidate's suitability for a role or presenting their message effectively to an audience. Whether a person is seeking employment, a platform to discuss a personal crisis, or media attention, an interview is a critical platform that can significantly impact various aspects of their life.

Leveraging Compelling Storytelling

Interviews, especially those of a celebrity or famous individuals, often lean towards the dramatic and the uncomfortable. Such interviews are crafted to delve deep into a person's life, unearthing compelling stories that resonate with audiences. The interview serves not just to inform but to engage emotionally, making the story more memorable and impactful.

The tension built and the discomfort generated by the interviewer can make the interview more intriguing. When someone is put under scrutiny or forced to confront their vulnerabilities, it can lead to more authentic revelations. This authenticity often translates into a more compelling narrative, drawing in viewers, readers, or listeners more effectively.

The Role of the Interviewer

Professional interviewers, particularly those in media, are skilled at eliciting such responses. They use tough and uncomfortable questions, finely tuned to evoke genuine reactions from their subjects. This can result in a more substantive and meaningful interview, which, in turn, benefits the audience looking for raw and unedited content. For the interviewer, successfully 'making the person sweat' can lead to interviews that are remembered and shared widely.

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Dynamics

One-way interviews, where the interviewer controls the conversation and poses discrete questions, differ fundamentally from dialogues where both parties engage in a back-and-forth exchange. In the latter, the interviewee might feel more comfortable and empowered, allowing for a more natural and candid conversation. However, in the absence of such interaction, the interviewee's power is significantly reduced.

The lack of interaction also means that the interviewee might not have the opportunity to clarify confusing points or provide context for their responses. This can sometimes lead to misinterpretations or failures to present a complete picture, which might impact the interviewee's position or message.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while interviews serve multiple purposes, the way they are conducted can often tip the scales in favor of the interviewer. Structured to provoke, challenge, and occasionally make the interviewee uncomfortable, these interviews create content that is engaging, memorable, and impactful. For the interviewer, mastering the art of questioning can lead to interviews that stand apart, ensuring their discussion not only serves an entertaining and informative purpose but also leaves a lasting impression on the audience.

Ultimately, whether the interview is designed to benefit the interviewer more than the interviewee depends on the interview's objectives and approach. However, the quality of the content and the level of engagement it generates can be a win for both parties if the interviewer successfully communicates and engages their audience effectively.