Why Are They Forcing 5G on the Public When They Know Multitudes of Health Risks Attached to It?

The real question isn't whether 5G poses health risks, but rather, how solid the evidence is to support such concerns. As of now, numerous studies by reputable organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) have not discovered any adverse health effects from 5G technology.

Lessons from 3G and 4G

Many critics of 5G draw parallels to previous generations of wireless technology, such as 3G and 4G. Interestingly, these same critics were once vocal about the dangers of upgrading from 3G to 4G. The irony lies in their inability to see the inconsistency in their arguments. The truth is, just because a technology was deemed harmful in the past doesn't mean the newer version should be similarly suspect.

The Science and Math Behind 5G

Some of the fears surrounding 5G stem from a basic misunderstanding of the science and mathematics underlying radio technology. For instance, opponents often exaggerate the power of cellular emissions, claiming that 100 mW to 1 W of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is dangerous. However, it is crucial to remember that human bodies naturally emit much more EMR through natural processes like body heat—around 50 W continuously. Furthermore, the sun alone emits over 2000 W per square meter.

Comparing 5G with Previous Generations

Another misconception is that 5G is more dangerous than its predecessors. This is not the case. 5G utilizes the same basic technology, the same frequencies, and the same power limits as 3G, 4G, and 2G. If 5G were truly that harmful, one could argue that people would have already suffered significant health issues from 3G, 4G, and 2G. However, there is no evidence to support such claims. In fact, if 5G were more dangerous, we would all be dead or at least seriously ill by now.

Everyday Exposure to Radiation

It's important to understand that virtually every consumer electronic device with wireless capabilities emits some level of EMR. Even your everyday devices contribute to your overall exposure:

Radios: They emit around 5 mW to 100 mW of EMR, comparable to a smoke alarm.

TVs: They can emit up to 1 W of EMR, similar to a cordless phone.

Cell phones: They usually emit around 1 W of EMR.

FM and TV Antennas: These older technologies actually emit more radiation than 5G. Yet, they are not subject to similar fear-mongering, likely because people use them regularly without concern.

The consensus among experts and scientists is that these levels of radiation are not harmful to human health. Moreover, the emissions are adequately regulated by telecommunications authorities to ensure safety.

The 5G Paranoia Problem

The fear of 5G has led to serious societal issues. There have been instances of attacks against cellphone towers, buildings, and even engineers. If you are genuinely concerned, the best approach is to live in a remote area far from any technological infrastructure. Otherwise, trusting in the scientific community and the regulatory bodies is the most rational course of action.

Conclusion

5G technology is a vital step in advancing our digital world. While it's natural to have concerns about any new technology, it's essential to base these concerns on sound scientific evidence rather than unproven theories. The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that 5G is safe for public use. Moving forward, ongoing research and responsible regulation will ensure that 5G continues to provide benefits without compromising public safety.